Making America great again with a USD2.3tn infrastructure plan
Published on December 2, 2021 by Avinash Kumar and Yogesh Mishra and Charan KJ
“Society of Civil Engineers gives US infrastructure ‘mediocre’ C minus grade”
The US is ranked among the top nations for education, entrepreneurship and quality of life. However, it lags behind in infrastructure, earning a C- on the American Society of Civil Engineers 2021 National Infrastructure Report Card.
Since the 1960s, public domestic investment as a percentage of GDP has dropped by more than 40%. It is, therefore, high time the US invested in infrastructure and competitiveness. It is now prepared to invest in ways it has not since the construction of interstate highways and its victory in the Space Race.
Years of neglect have resulted in roads decaying, bridges in need of repair, insufficient public transportation, antiquated school buildings and other vital infrastructure requirements. We believe it is crucial to take stock of recent expenditure patterns as the country discusses its next big wave of infrastructure investment.
Why the major boost in infra spending?
The following points dive deep into these spending shifts, showing the challenges the US faces both in maintaining and upgrading its infrastructure in a coordinated, long-term manner.
I. Total public infrastructure spending declined by USD9.9bn in real terms from 2007 to 2017
II. Infrastructure operation and maintenance spending has increased by USD23.2bn (9.5%) in the past decade while total government spending has decreased
III. Transportation infrastructure spending has decreased by USD4.2bn (1.4%) since 2007, but has shown signs of recovery in the past five years
Real operation and maintenance costs have increased from USD243.3bn to USD266.5bn since 2007, while real capital project spending has fallen by 16%, from USD207.1bn to USD174.0bn.
As a result, operation and maintenance now account for 60.5% of total public infrastructure spending in the US, up from 54.0% a decade before. On the other hand, capital spending has dropped to 39.5% from 46.0%. While the trends of increasing expenditure on operations and maintenance and reducing investment in capital projects have been gradually gaining momentum since the 1950s, they accelerated in the previous decade.
Biden’s USD2.3tn plan to rebuild infrastructure and reshape the economy
President Biden has introduced a USD2.3tn plan to rebuild and upgrade US infrastructure, calling it a transformational effort that could create the “most resilient, innovative economy in the world”.
“It is not a plan that tinkers around the edges”, Biden said in a speech outside Pittsburgh. “It is a once-in-a-generation investment in America.”
President Biden’s proposal to increase infrastructure spending by more than 1% of GDP over the next decade has both short- and long-term benefits.
It has a large “multiplier” — the rise in GDP for every dollar invested in the short term. In an economy with high unemployment and large slack, traditional infrastructure spending has a one-year multiplier of close to 1.5, one of the largest compared to other types of federal government spending and tax policy. With nearly 3m more unemployed permanently as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, an infrastructure plan that creates new opportunities in communities around the country would be especially beneficial.
Economic studies show that in the long term, public infrastructure contributes significantly to GDP and jobs. It reduces company costs, improving competitiveness and productivity; it lets people to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time, increasing labour participation and cutting carbon emissions.
This is an especially good time to enhance infrastructure spending, because the return on investment is far higher than the government’s cost of financing. Thirty-year treasury yields are just over 2%, but the return on practically any public infrastructure investment would almost certainly be significantly higher.
Financing the massive infrastructure spending
To finance the USD2.3tn infrastructure makeover, the federal government is looking to make multiple changes to US tax rules to put the cost of the plan entirely on corporates.
These include raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from the 21% levy set by the Trump administration’s 2017 tax bill, eliminating all fossil fuel industry subsidies and loopholes, and establishing a minimum tax on income companies use to report profits to investors.
The reforms will add 0.5% to US GDP per year in corporate revenue; the White House says this will fully pay for investments within the next 15 years and reduce the government’s deficit after that.
Biden’s tax plan for corporates Biden’s USD2.3tn American jobs plan
Governments have historically accounted for the bulk of infrastructure investment and development, whether funded directly or indirectly via corporatised state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The emergence and development of public-private partnerships and other forms of private participation in infrastructure in recent decades have expanded options for infrastructure development and financing. The infrastructure bill is expected not only to drive economic activity, but also to act as a tailwind for the government, developers, investors, financiers and other stakeholders in the infrastructure arena. Capital-intensive investments would also require investment banks, and conventional public finance, public sector and corporate banking taking an active role in financing and advising.
How Acuity Knowledge Partners can help
We help investment banking teams scale up their project finance practices and drive value for their clients. By leveraging dedicated teams of experienced analysts at our offshore delivery centres, our clients benefit from operational efficiency and cost optimisation. Our team of project finance experts are well versed in covering public finance and project finance and are vested with state-of-the-art modelling capabilities. Many of our clients working with our specialised project finance investment banking teams have benefited from our integrated suite of services along the investment banking advisory value chain.
About the Authors
Avinash Kumar has over 7+ years of experience working across different value chain in the Investment Banking domain. Currently, supports Public Finance / Project Finance team, with a focus on Infrastructure Finance / Municipal Finance — Public Private Partnership(P3). He is instrumental in developing automated excel templates for daily, weekly and monthly Infra / Muni market updates, for a U.S. based mid-market Investment Bank, in Bangalore. He holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration in Finance.
Yogesh Mishra has 1+ year of experience in Investment Banking domain, with major focus on executing assignments related to Project Finance, Public Finance and Infrastructure — Public Private Partnership (PPP), for a U.S. based mid-market Investment Bank. He holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration in Finance.
Charan KJ has 1+ year of experience in Project and Public Finance domain. Currently supporting the team on various assignments including daily, weekly and monthly Infra and Muni market updates, among others, for a U.S. based mid-market Investment Bank. He holds Master’s degree in Business Administration with specialization in Corporate Finance.
Originally published at https://www.acuitykp.com.